Deputy Senate President and chairman of the committee, Senator Ike Ekweremadu |
Stops elevated
vice-presidents, deputy governors from contesting elections
Creates tenure for
Attorney General of the Federation
Halts states
creation, rotational presidency, Joint State-LG Accounts
Outlaws president’s
signature for constitution amendment
By: Omololu Ogunmade
After weeks of expectations, the Senate Committee for the
Review of the 1999 Constitution submitted its report Wednesday with a
recommendation, among others, barring a vice-president or deputy governor who
succeeds a president or governor on account of death from contesting for such
offices during a general election.
If this recommendation as contained in Sections 136 (2) and
181 (2) of the draft amendment bill, read for the first time on the floor of
the Senate Wednesday, sails through, President Goodluck Jonathan would be the
first and last vice-president to ascend the office of the president following
the death of his principal, to contest a subsequent presidential election.
In the same vein, Sections 136 (1c) and 181 (1c) of the
draft bill respectively stipulate that if a president-elect or governor-elect
dies before swearing-in, the vice-president-elect or deputy governor-elect
shall be sworn in as the president or governor respectively only to serve out
the tenure of the deceased, but will not be eligible to stand for subsequent
elections.
Also, Section 137 (c) of the draft bill, which seeks to
replace the current four-year tenure with a single term of six years,
stipulates that anybody holding the office of the president or vice-president
before the take-off of the amended constitution, is barred from standing for
election for a single tenure of six years.
However, the report as presented by the Deputy Senate
President and chairman of the committee, Senator Ike Ekweremadu, was silent on
the time of the take-off of the single tenure proposal.
The report stated that recommending a single tenure for
heads of executive office was necessary “considering the financial expenses
often associated with re-elections and to ensure that the executive heads are
freed from distractions so that they can concentrate on public policy issues.
While Section 9(A) in the draft bill outlaws the necessity
for president’s signature in the amended constitution, sub-section 3(B) of the
section stipulates that the National Assembly can also propose a new
constitution.
If this provision succeeds, the agitation for a people’s
constitution through a Sovereign National Conference (SNC) will be a forgone
conclusion.
The report also recommended the separation of the Office of
the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) from that of the Minister of
Justice and is seeking a single tenure of seven years for the AGF, which
according to Section 150 sub-sections 4, 5 and 6 of the draft amendment bill,
shall not be subject to the direction or control of any other authority in the
discharge of the functions of his office.
The AGF, who will be appointed by the president subject to
the Senate’s confirmation, according to sub-section 6 of the draft, can only be
removed by the president, acting on an address supported by two-thirds majority
of the Senate praying for his removal over inability to function effectively or
on account of gross misconduct.
On states creation, Ekweremadu, who said the committee
received no fewer than 61 requests on this subject matter, added that the
proposal did not sail through because none of the requests met the requirements
for state creation as spelt out in Section 8 (1) of the constitution, as
amended.
Section 162 (5) of the draft also grants autonomy to the
local government through funding via a first line charge and therefore outlawed
the existing joint-state local government account.
Ekweremadu said this recommendation was made to create room
for accountability and an effective local government system.
In the same vein, sub-section 6 of Section 162 of the draft
also empowers the federal government to withhold funds of any local government
that is not administered by a democratically elected leadership, but added that
this excludes local councils where elections are not held as a result of
natural disasters, breach of peace and other emergencies.
On the other hand, sub-section 6 (b) of the draft seeks to
outlaw judicial interventions in the conduct of local government elections,
saying, “Nothing in this constitution shall empower a court to stop the holding
of local government elections.”
Section 58 of the draft also stipulates that “where the
president neither signifies that he assents or that he withholds assent to a
bill, the bill shall at the expiration of 30 days become law.”
Controversially, Section 84 (5A) of the draft provides that
former senate presidents, former deputy senate presidents, former speakers of
the House of Representatives and their deputies shall be entitled to life
pension at a rate equivalent to the annual salary of incumbent holders of such
offices. This provision is bound to raise eyebrows because the Senate had
earlier thrown out a bill seeking to remunerate the aforementioned
parliamentarians, describing it as unjustifiable.
Ekweremadu also reported that the committee rejected
proposals for state police, saying instead “the committee recommended that the
preferred approach at this time is to critically look at the current federal
police system with a view to sanitising it”.
Further, he said the committee failed to adopt the proposal
seeking the assignment of portfolios to ministers before their names are sent
to the Senate for confirmation, noting that “assigning portfolios should be the
prerogative of the president for reasons of flexibility”, observing further:
“It has been shown that professional qualifications do not necessarily
approximate to performance in practical terms.”
The committee also rejected the proposal for the
entrenchment of the rotation of the presidency in the constitution, submitting
that Nigerian leadership should not be reduced to ethnic or regional
considerations.
The committee also ignored the agitation for a provision in
the constitution seeking a special status for Lagos State.
“While the committee said it appreciated the peculiar needs
and challenges of Lagos, it is our considered opinion that accordingly such
special status should be a matter of political decision which should be kept
out of the constitution,” the report added.
No comments:
Post a Comment